Saturday, January 8, 2011

Learning: From Speculation to Science

So far, I have only read chapter one. There are some very interesting ideas, though, that ring true to me, at least. First is the idea that what we consider knowing has changed. I remember when I was in high school (waaaaay back when), everyone thought I was super smart because I could memorize well, but I never felt that my memory indicated my intellect. What is the use of being able to spew forth trivial information? The value of knowledge comes in being able to connect, to apply what you know to a given situation or idea. I think that is where the understanding comes in. And, as the text indicated, being able to take what you know, and bring that into play with what you are being taught really enhances the learning process.

Back to the idea of "what is knowing." The text also mentioned that knowing has shifted to being able to find and use knowledge. Reflecting on the leadership experiences I have had, that is really a crucial element. I was a leader not because I knew the answers, but because I knew how to find them, and took the initiative to find them. People turned to me because they knew that I would find an answer. I have always considered the ability to learn one of my greatest strengths, and I think we assume that it's one of those inalienable qualities we all have--we are people, therefore we can all learn. That is true, but as the reading points out, some of us are better at it than others, and there are ways to become better learners.

So, those are just a few things I've been thinking about as I read, but I'm sure there is more to come with Chapter 2: How Experts Differ from Novices

No comments:

Post a Comment