Saturday, March 19, 2011

Let's Eat: A meal approach to workshops

I really liked the way Kristin presented putting together a workshop. Looking at it as courses to a meal is a really helpful strategy. There were a lot of things I had never considered. I tend to focus on the content of a presentation, rather than the basics that other people will be worrying about. When I am in the audience, I think about a lot of other things besides the content, so it makes sense to consider that as the presenter. And in terms of content, I usually tend to think about the new ideas I want to present, rather than considering what they already know and how I can build on that, how I can connect to the audience. I haven't ever done anything quite on the scale of a workshop, but I think these same principles could apply in other situations.


It was also interesting to participate in the discussion with Bobbi Newman. First, I just have to say, as wonderful as chat is, it has its limits. Every now and then, my siblings (I have 7) and I end up in a big chat, and it really is like everyone in the room talking at once to everyone. I'd almost rather have the conversation in a room, because then at least I don't have to read everything to follow the mini-conversation I'm part of! (And, then I'd be hanging out with my siblings, which is a definite bonus!)

But I really did get more out of the discussion than "large chats can be chaotic". First off, I really appreciated that Bobbi was able to step back from the emotions of the HarperCollins situation. I think that our first reaction can cloud our thinking and keep us from finding out all of the facts. Also, from just reading on the web, you get the feeling that everyone in libraries is irate about this, but Monday's discussion gave a different perspective. Once you know that there are publisher's that don't distribute e-books to libraries, all of a sudden the whole situation seems less dramatic. That's not to say that the HarperCollins debate is a non-issue. Obviously there are concerns, and decisions that need to be made. But having broader background knowledge, for me at least, changed how I understand the situation and the problem. It also made the response by ALA and OverDrive more appropriate.

The discussion my cohorts and I had before we had the discussion with Bobbi Newman was also enlightening. The issue certainly didn't arouse passions - it concerned us, and got us thinking, but I don't think any of us felt passionate enough to boycott or write letters to our congressmen. The discussion we had generated some interesting thoughts. One thing we discussed was how people are becoming like libraries. People felt like the HarperCollins policy was differentiating libraries from regular customers, which, they are in a way. I buy a book, and I can loan it to people, but that's not why I buy the book. A library buys a book to loan to people. But what is interesting is how people are becoming more like libraries. I can buy music on itunes and play it on a certain number of computers, and then transfer it to other devices, as well. And, from what I understand, certain ebook vendors are doing the same type of thing. We didn't really have time to finish the discussion, and I'm not sure what the implications are or what I feel about it, but it is interesting to consider.

All in all, it was another great class with great discussion. Stay tuned - great same blogspot, great same amateur blogger - for the details of our workshop!

5 comments:

  1. I had the same reaction you did to the workshop meal plan (see my post: http://livelovelibraries.blogspot.com/) . I really always thought good presentations were about content (and they are) but there is SO MUCH MORE that is necessary for people to truly learn, process, and remember with the intent to use when workshops are happening. Glad you articulated this too!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that the talk put the Harper Collins thing in perspective, as I hadn't carefully considered the fact that many publishers don't make e-books available to libraries at all! The weird and interesting thing though is that I seem to harbor more distaste for HC than the other publishers. I guess it's because they're out of sight, out of mind? Also, there isn't the sense of "taking away" or going back on a deal. Personally, I'm really just floored by the rationale behind limiting check-outs being linked to the durability of physical materials. I would be less upset if they just said "we're setting this number because we want to make money."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that the chat session with Bobbi got rather chaotic. There seemed to be several smaller groups of people each holding their own mini-conversations on the chat feed and pushing their own viewpoints and agendas. Bobbi handled it really well, though--she just went through the questions in chronological order, not caring if people were posting faster than she could answer because it was the quality, not the quantity that counted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The meal analogy for a workshop was definitely helpful, and I can see myself using it in the future! The discussion did get a little hectic, but I'm with Karmen when she says that Bobbi handled it well. In fact, going through questions chronologically will be a good strategy to use when we go to do our own webinars. So, aside from getting great perspective about HCOD, I also loved that we got a good example of a webinar in class.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm a little late to comment, but I just wanted to add that I like your point about how people are becoming more like libraries. (Or at least are being treated more like libraries in terms of their ePurchases).

    I also agree with you about being unbiased with regard to HCOD--I appreciated Bobbi Newman's perspective more for this reason.

    ReplyDelete